Part II
From the above it is crystal clear that the rank pay was
deducted twice. Once at the time of fixing the minimum initial pay for each
rank from Capt to Brig in terms of para 6 (a) (ii) of SAI of 1987, and again at
the time for calculation of emoluments which has been partially corrected now
after the SC order. In most cases even the 20% fitment weightage was
denied.
The increased minimum
initial pay at IV CPC will have a cascading effect on the pay scales at the V
CPC as the integrated scale was replaced by individual rank based pay scales.
Rank pay was also deducted at the time of pay fixation of V CPC both at the
time of deciding on the rank based pay scales as well as at the time of
fixation. The existing pay scales of V CPC are depressed scales based on the
lowered minimum for each rank at IV CPC which needs to be corrected.
Accordingly the new scales would be as given
Rank/Pay Scale
|
Existing as per SAI
1997 at V CPC
|
Revised scales w/o
deduction of rank pay at V CPC
|
Captain
|
9600-300-11400 +RP
400
|
10000-300-11800+ RP
400
|
Major
|
11925-325-14850+RP1200
|
12800-325-16050 + RP
1200*
|
Lt Col
|
13500-400-17100+RP
1600
|
15100-400-18700+RP1600
|
Colonel
|
15100-450-17350+RP
2000
|
17100-400-19350+RP
2000
|
Brigadier
|
16700-450-18050+RP
2400
|
19100-450-20450+RP
2400
|
* Note:
The corresponding Civil scale of Major of 4100/4500, were rationalized
and merged and given 14300-400-18300. Here again the Majors were given a raw
deal.
Once this is implemented, then for VI CPC, the
minimum of pay in the pay band and grade pay will correspondingly increase.
Rank
|
|
Existing /
Revised Scales
|
Pay in the pay band
|
Grade
Pay
|
MSP
|
Total
Pay
|
Diff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Captain
|
Existing
Revised
|
9600+400 RP
10000+400RP
|
18600
19350
|
6100
6600
|
6000
6000
|
30700
31950
|
1250
|
Major
|
Existing
Revised
|
11600+1200RP
13125+1200RP
|
23810
26650
|
6600
7600
|
6000
6000
|
36410
40250
|
3840
|
Lt Colonel
|
Existing
Revised
|
13500+1600RP
15100+1600RP
|
38530
42120
|
8000
8700
|
6000
6000
|
52530
56820
|
4290
|
Colonel
|
Existing
Revised
|
15100+2000RP
17100+2000RP
|
40890
46050
|
8700
8900
|
6000
6000
|
55590
60950
|
5360
|
Brigadier
|
Existing
Revised
|
16700+2400RP
19100+2400RP
|
43390
48870
|
8900
10000
|
6000
6000
|
58290
64870
|
6580
|
Q Was rank pay as admissible to Lt Col
paid to Lt Col (TS)?
A No, neither at IV CPC nor at V CPC.
Q What is the definition of rank pay?
A Rank pay as defined by the IV CPC
states’ Rank pay is admissible to an officer appropriate to the rank actually
held, either in acting or substantive capacity, in addition to the pay in the
revised scale. It is also stated therein that rank pay forms part of basic pay.
It has been further clarified by MoD vide their letter of 29 Feb 2000 that, It
is that element of their pay which is identified with their rank, which in turn
has a relationship with their scale of pay. It will consequently be taken into
account for determining their entitlement to such of those financial
benefits/concessions etc including retirement benefits, as are directly related
to the basic pay or their pay scales.
The Army/Navy/Airforce
instructions would be amended accordingly. These never got amended and the denial continued.
Q What does DSR say on substantive pay?
A Changes in DSR 1962 Edition vs 1987 Edition
Para 65 of 1962
edition
“Substantive
promotion to the rank of Lt Colonel of officers not promoted by selection
under para 66
below, against the authorized establishment of Lt Cols, may be made,
subject to
their being considered fit in all
respects by time –scale, on completion of 24
years
reckonable commissioned service provided they
have not attained the age of
compulsory
retirement. Officer so promoted will not
be reckoned, against the authorised
establishment
of Lt Cols, but will be held in the separate ‘non-selection’ list,
except that
an officer
selected to act as a Lt Col before completing 24 years service and made
substantive
under this rule on completing 24 years’ reckonable service will be held
against an
authorized Lt Col appointment”.
Para 66(i) of 1987 edition
“Substantive
promotion to the rank of Lt Col of officers not promoted by selection
against the
authorized establishment of Lt Cols, may be made, subject to their being
considered fit
in all respects, by time scale, on
completion of 21 years reckonable
commissioned
service but not more than 26 years reckonable commissioned service
provided
they have not become due for retirement
on the basis of the age of
superannuation
prescribed for the rank time scale of Lt Col. Officers so promoted will not
not be reckoned, against the authorized
establishment of Lt Cols, but will be held in the
separate ‘non-selection’
list. The number of officers
held on the ‘non selection’ list
and will count
against the authorized establishment of officers in the
rank of Major”. Concluded
198
198
rs a