Thursday, May 24, 2012

ANNUAL GENERAL BODY MEETING JUNE 2012


It is intimated that the Annual General Body Meeting of the Retired Defence Officers Association (RDOA) will be held on 17 Jun 2012 at 11:00  AM
at SilverRoom, DSOI Dhaula Kuan New Delhi.

AGENDA

1.    Welcome address by the President RDOA.

2.    Judgment and progress of the IV Pay Commission Rank Pay anomaly case.

3.    To seek approval of the members for additional contribution of Rs 1000/- for meeting expenses of the Senior Advocate fees in the IV CPC case

4.    Confirmation of minutes of the last AGM.

5.    Notice also displayed on  rdoaindia  website: http://sites.google.com/site/rdoaindia  under link AGM

Secy RDOA

6 comments:

Dhoop said...

It would be of interest to all admirers of the work being done by RDOA, and all those desirous of joining the association, whether the association represents all the respondents in all the cases tagged along with Transfer Petition 56/2007? Also of interest is whether all the respondents in TP(civil) 56/2007 are active members of RDOA?

gentle said...

Kindly publish the bank details of RDOA account to facilitate the on line transfer of funds to you by those settled abroad , who wish to do so instead of mailing the cheque to you since I find that the cheques issued by me have not been actioned by my bank as my signatures do not match with their records!

RDOA said...

For the conveience of the offrs living abroad send email to RDOA at rdoaindia@gmail.com. Bank details will be provided for e transfer

OneTopic at a time said...

I am awaiting minutes of the AGM to contribute more.

Collamba said...

It is requested that the Government may please be urged to withdraw its Appeal pending in Court in the above case in pursuance of the above said Policy of the Govt as well as directions to the Govt by the Apex

Court in numerous cases – to avoid un-necessary litigation – especially in respect of
service and pensioner matters and implement the verdict


NATIONAL LITIGATION POLICY
Announced by Hon’ble Law Minister, Shri Veerappa Moily on 23. 6.2010
(a) Ensuring that good cases are won and bad cases are not needlessly
persevered with,
(b) That litigation will not be resorted to for the sake of litigation,
(c) That false pleas and technical points will not be taken and shall be
discouraged,
(d) Ensuring that the correct facts in all relevant documents will be placed
before the Courts,
(e) Government must cease to be a compulsive litigant,
(f) The easy approach " Let the courts decide" must be eschewed and
condemned,
(g) Given that tribunalisation is meant to remove the load from the courts,
challenge to the orders of the Tribunal should be an exception and not a
matter of routine,
(h) Proceedings will not be filed in service matters merely because the order
of the Administrative Tribunal affects a number of employees,
(i) Proceedings will be filed challenging the orders of Administrative Tribunal
only if (i) there is a clear error of record and finding has been entered against
the Government, and (ii) the judgement of the Tribunal is contrary to a service
rule or its interpretation by a High Court or the Supreme Court.

Collamba said...

It is requested that the Government may please be urged to withdraw its Appeal pending Court in
pursuance of the above said Policy of the Govt as well as directions to the Govt by the Apex
Court in numerous cases – to avoid un-necessary litigation – especially in respect of
service and pensioner matters and implement the verdict


NATIONAL LITIGATION POLICY
Announced by Hon’ble Law Minister, Shri Veerappa Moily on 23. 6.2010
(a) Ensuring that good cases are won and bad cases are not needlessly
persevered with,
(b) That litigation will not be resorted to for the sake of litigation,
(c) That false pleas and technical points will not be taken and shall be
discouraged,
(d) Ensuring that the correct facts in all relevant documents will be placed
before the Courts,
(e) Government must cease to be a compulsive litigant,
(f) The easy approach " Let the courts decide" must be eschewed and
condemned,
(g) Given that tribunalisation is meant to remove the load from the courts,
challenge to the orders of the Tribunal should be an exception and not a
matter of routine,
(h) Proceedings will not be filed in service matters merely because the order
of the Administrative Tribunal affects a number of employees,
(i) Proceedings will be filed challenging the orders of Administrative Tribunal
only if (i) there is a clear error of record and finding has been entered against
the Government, and (ii) the judgement of the Tribunal is contrary to a service
rule or its interpretation by a High Court or the Supreme Court.